{"id":1285,"date":"2017-06-14T11:22:24","date_gmt":"2017-06-14T02:22:24","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www2.igs.ocha.ac.jp\/en\/?p=1285"},"modified":"2025-10-23T14:16:08","modified_gmt":"2025-10-23T05:16:08","slug":"20170614-2","status":"publish","type":"reports","link":"https:\/\/www2.igs.ocha.ac.jp\/en\/reports\/20170614-2\/","title":{"rendered":"Seminar: What Do People Mean When They Talk About Constitutional&#8230;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>IGS seminar: What Do People Mean When They Talk About Constitutional Revision?<\/strong><\/p>\n<div class=\"wc-shortcodes-row wc-shortcodes-item wc-shortcodes-clearfix\">\n<div class=\"wc-shortcodes-column wc-shortcodes-content wc-shortcodes-two-third wc-shortcodes-column-first \">\n<p>For their second seminar on constitutional amendment, the Conference on Gender and Politics in East Asia invited Kenneth Mori McElwain, Associate Professor at the University of Tokyo Institute of Social Science and public opinion polling expert, to attend. The seminar was held on June 14<sup>th<\/sup>, 2017, with the following theme\u2014\u201cWhat Do People Mean When They Talk About Constitutional Revision?\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Japan\u2019s is the world\u2019s oldest unamended constitution, but amendment discussions have heated up in recent years, with the media also presenting assertions from various political parties. However, Mr. McElwain pointed out that, by contrast, public opinion on constitutional amendment has not been sufficiently verified.<\/p>\n<p>In June 2017, using an independent online opinion poll experiment, Mr. McElwain examined the extent to which public opinion is influenced by who they perceive to be proposing the constitutional amendment proposals. \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>The experiment divided the subjects of the opinion poll into two groups. One group was presented with the Liberal Democratic Party\u2019s (hereinafter LDP) 2012 amendment proposals as \u201cthe LDP amendment proposals,\u201d whereas the other group was presented with the same 2012 LDP proposal as \u201cthe experts\u2019 proposals.\u201d The poll subjects were then asked for their opinions on each of the proposed amendments. The two groups\u2019 responses were then compared against each other.<\/p>\n<p>The results of the comparison revealed that those who had been told they were looking at an \u201cexperts\u2019 proposals\u201d were about 5%\u201310% more likely to agree with the amendment proposals. A difference was also observed on an issue-by-issue basis. Notably, for new issues that had not been included in amendment discussions up to that point, environmental rights and privacy rights, the results showed that respondents were more likely to agree with the \u201cexperts\u2019 amendment proposals.\u201d In contrast, with respect to <em>traditional<\/em> issues such as Constitution Article 9 and the Imperial Family, no statistically significant difference was observed between the responses of the two groups. Mr. McElwain interpreted this as respondents already identifying these issues as <em>conservative<\/em>, irrespective of who was proposing them.<\/p>\n<p>In this experiment, no consistent gender difference was observed. However, a tendency for women to prefer the \u201cexperts\u2019 amendment proposals\u201d with respect to privacy rights and national emergency articles was observed; and a tendency for men to prefer the \u201cexperts\u2019 amendment proposals\u201d with respect to the right to know and environmental rights was observed.<\/p>\n<p>The seminar participants engaged in lively discussion on gender differences in the responses and the extent to which the media\u2019s role in framing public opinion polls questions about constitutional amendment impacted those differences.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"wc-shortcodes-column wc-shortcodes-content wc-shortcodes-one-third wc-shortcodes-column-last \">\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-1299\" src=\"https:\/\/www2.igs.ocha.ac.jp\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/04\/20170614kaijo.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"250\" height=\"188\" \/><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-1298\" src=\"https:\/\/www2.igs.ocha.ac.jp\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/04\/20170614.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"250\" height=\"346\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www2.igs.ocha.ac.jp\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/04\/20170614.jpg 250w, https:\/\/www2.igs.ocha.ac.jp\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/04\/20170614-217x300.jpg 217w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 250px) 100vw, 250px\" \/><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"template":"","reports_category":[134],"class_list":["post-1285","reports","type-reports","status-publish","hentry","reports_category-reports-2017"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www2.igs.ocha.ac.jp\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/reports\/1285","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www2.igs.ocha.ac.jp\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/reports"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www2.igs.ocha.ac.jp\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/reports"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www2.igs.ocha.ac.jp\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1285"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"reports_category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www2.igs.ocha.ac.jp\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/reports_category?post=1285"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}